The work · why it matters
The capabilities expanded and so did the possibilities
I wasn't paying serious attention to AI in 2022 or 2023. The tools weren't capable enough to actually change how people work, and I knew it. That changed in 2024. I started experimenting in my own work and education, and once I understood what the tools could actually do, I started sharing it with students. That's how the Learning Labs started: free sessions to help people build a genuine understanding of AI before companies started requiring it of them.
What I kept seeing, as the space grew louder, were tools designed to remove people from their own work entirely. The pitch was that automation would lessen the burden. But when all the writing is handled by AI, there's no voice left, no authenticity in what gets produced. The organization loses the thing that made the work worth reading in the first place. A grant application can be faster to write and still sound exactly like the organization that wrote it. That's the difference I'm trying to make.
I want to work with nonprofits because they're doing the most important work while operating under the heaviest constraints. The research I've gathered describes organizations managing programs on skeleton teams, rebuilding grant applications from scratch each funding cycle because there's never time to document the last one, and watching institutional knowledge walk out the door every time someone leaves. They're not looking for a technology project. They want someone who understands what their team actually does, can find the specific workflows eating the most time, and can build something that gives that time back without asking them to become AI experts in the process.